Paul Simon

You're the One - Paul Simon

Release Date: 10/03/2000

Recording Date: 10/2000

Tracks: 11

Length: 00:44:04 Hrs

Label: Warner Bros.

Type: DVA,CS,CD,LP

Genre/Styles

Album Tracks (11)

Song Title
Length
Lyrics
3.
No matches found
Old
02:19
4.
Search web for matches
04:27
5.
No matches found
03:36
6.
No matches found
03:54
8.
Search web for matches
03:50
10.
No matches found
04:12
11.
Search web for matches
04:17
Average User Rating
Currently 0.0 / 5.0 Stars
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 2 out of 5 stars
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 out of 5 stars
Views 244 Comments 0 (Write your own)

To share this media with a friend, you must have AIM installed. Click the "Download AIM" button to install AIM. If you already have AIM, click the "Send Instant Message"

What the Critics Say

The disaster of Songs from the Capeman hit Paul Simon particularly hard, so he decided to quickly record a new album, his first proper collection of songs since 1990's The Rhythm of the Saints -- his first album in ten years, really. Nevertheless, if this album has a relative, it's 1982's Hearts and Bones, since it's a deliberately low-key, insular record, especially when compared to the sweeping worldbeat explorations of Graceland and Rhythm. But where Hearts and Bones was a singer/songwriter album, no two ways about it, You're the One illustrates the influence of its predecessors, but it's not showy about it. The African and South American rhythms are as much a foundation of Simon's music as folk is, and his compositions reflect it, boasting surprisingly tricky rhythms that carry through to his melodies themselves. That, combined with Simon's determination to meet aging head-on, makes You're the One a bit of an acquired taste, especially since its compositions are never overtly accessible and melodic -- they're all tone poems, driven as much by tone and lyric as song itself. This all results in a record that may be a little too deliberately low-key and elliptical for most tastes, especially since it demands full concentration even from serious fans. But this does reward close listening, and even if it doesn't shine as brilliantly as Hearts and Bones (his most underappreciated record), it does share some similarities in that it's an unassumingly intellectual record that feels like it was made without an audience in mind. Which means it's more interesting than successful, but interesting can have its own rewards. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide

Recent Comments

Add your own comment
Currently there are no comments
1000 character maximum

Tips On Commenting

ADVERTISEMENT
Fill Up Some Playlists
Just click on ADD whenever
you see videos.
Watch free music videos, tune in to Aol Radio, get free music downloads, read music news, and search for your favorite music artists.